Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MD Streeter's avatar

Screw the V12 Cadillac. PUT THE V16 IN IT.

Expand full comment
G. K.'s avatar

I would just *love* to know what series of myopic board room meetings led to GM and Cadillac green-lighting the Celestiq. Were they just chomping at the bit to get back to their pre-Sloanian "Standard of the World" days, and only thought they could justify it with an EV? Did they think an EV flagship would actually solidify the idea that EVs are luxury items and sell more Lyriqs and Optiqs and Escalade IQs (at a loss)? Did they just really want to capture a slice of the market of people who put 1,000 miles on a car a year?

Someone please inform me, because I can't think of a single good business case for the Celestiq, and I'm pretty imaginative. I also can't think of who would buy one, other than whichever Hollywood A-lister they've paid-off to be a brand ambassador for it.

I imagine the Celestiq would actually be a whole lot more relevant and desirable if it had one of GM's spectacular V8 engines. Hell, they could throw in a supercharged LS block, not unlike the one in the current Escalade V, or even the short-lived Blackwing V8 that was only used in the CT6-V and CT6 4.2 Twin-Turbo Platinum. Sadly, GM seems content to erase all of its excellent engineering history making cars that people wanted and still want, in favor of cars that it has to convince people they want.

BMW is doing the same thing with its current styling: working its damndest to erase any semblance of its classically balanced design or even the basic brand hallmarks. The current 5 Series looks like it could have been designed by anybody; there's nothing "BMW" about it. And so is Porsche, which is trying to disavow the history of entry-level cars that were genuinely good, in spite of how deliberately kneecapped they were.

It seems like all of these companies are apologizing for the great achievements of their past, and committing to making the future a lot less fun. Witness Mercedes: "We're sorry we once put a stonking 6.2-liter V8 in a car the size of a matchbox. Here, have this high-strung turbocharged electrified 4-cylinder wearing the same AMG 63 badge, instead!"

Meanwhile, I'm sorely tempted to buy a 2024 ES 350 Ultra Luxury. It's roomy, extremely comfortable, has lovely materials you don't get in cars costing twice as much, and has a naturally-aspirated V6 without hybridization *or* stop/start. And it'll last forever, if reasonably cared for. I have the S 550 Coupe, but an ES 350 makes a better--and more cost-effective--daily. And won't need preserving, while allowing me to preserve the S 550 Coupe.

Expand full comment
470 more comments...

No posts