Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff R's avatar

I'm curious what will happen with non-competes that are actually legit. Preventing a CEO with a head full of strategic plans and trade secrets from going to a direct competitor is a legitimate thing for a company to do. Preventing a hairdresser from going down the street to another salon is ridiculous. The line is somewhere in between. Personally I think it's probably consideration for the agreement beyond simply getting the job or the ability to negotiate it that a CEO clearly has.

I'm just a lowly senior engineer. My non-compete says that if they prevent me from taking a job, they have to continue to pay my salary to do nothing for as long as they do so. That seems fair to me. They won't enforce it unless they have a reason, because they have to pay up, and if they do I get paid to search for the next job. I did negotiate it from ridiculously overbroad down to working for a company with a competing product to something I directly worked on.

Expand full comment
Henry C.'s avatar

Regarding the rural white voter fear porn: to all the rootless cosmopolitans, please, for the love of all that is holy, ignore them. You can hate them and fear them like the boogeyman, but leave them alone and they won't bother you. I can promise with near 100% certainty that your daughters will be able to vacuum out as many of your grandchildren as they can possibly conceive. And stop treating their lives, livelihood, homes and land as gambling chips. Enjoy living in your third world police states. K, thx, bye.

Secession would be the most positive thing that could occur in what's left of my lifetime.

Expand full comment
385 more comments...

No posts