636 Comments
User's avatar
Colin's avatar

Shameless plug; we talked about this a few weeks ago and it's now on BAT: https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1984-porsche-911-carrera-coupe-74/

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

I saw my first Singer last summer and sir, that Singer ain't got nothing on your car.

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

You flatter me

Expand full comment
Drunkonunleaded's avatar

Scrolled to the comments and saw your first one about the respray. Immediately my mind went to “some non-bidder is going to cry about Glasurite.” It was quite literally the next comment.

That’s a good looking car, I hope you get all of the money for it.

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

I really wanted to ask him if he was going to bid

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

Don’t waste your time. You’ve already been very responsive to the real questions and supplied good answers. You are already doing the best thing any seller can do.

On the car I bought on BaT, there was a bidder who upped the price out of the blue, so I looked up his BaT history. This jerk bid on the car I ended up winning, and his bid was his 50th standalone bid on BaT. He never stayed around to bid again a second time on any of the 50 cars he bid on, nor did he ever win an auction. All I can guess is that he had psychological problems. Ignore the trolls.

Expand full comment
Nplus1's avatar
5hEdited

You don't want to be argumentative with any of the commenters. They'll band together to sink your auction. Just try to stay positive and keep pushing info and photos out throughout the week.

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

Of course, thanks for the tip! I’m going to go weigh it after breakfast and post that. I lost my last scale receipt.

Expand full comment
Jeff Winks's avatar

Your response is solid.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

its so peak

hope it makes you rich

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

Ehh I doubt it. I'll settle for fair market value.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

What is fair market value? 911s can be astronomically expensive or relatively inexpensive for no obvious reason to those of us who don’t know all the fine details that make one more special than another.

Looks like it could be bought and driven for years? Seems like a good car to buy if you want to actually put miles on it.

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

Completely right Scott! I don’t think this one has any special provenance. If someone who knows how much better these are modified wants its, maybe 85, if it’s all the closer-to-stock=closer-to-godliness people, maybe 65. Having recently realized that I’m maybe 30-40 into this, on top of purchase, I’m hoping for a bidding war! The whole point of selling is to get $$.

Expand full comment
Thomas Hank's avatar

A mid 80s, Guards Red whale tail has been on my bucket list for a long time. Seems like a super nice example that’ll be far more attainable than a 930 to most interested parties. Hopefully it does very well for you.

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

Buy it and I'll ship it for free.

Expand full comment
Thomas Hank's avatar

I’m up to 8 right now with the daily (eek!). I’d need to thin the collection…which I probably should anyhow. Tempting car for sure.

I might be as bad as Jack but at least he has a barn.

Expand full comment
unsafe release's avatar

She’s gorgeous. Interesting history including Hawaii and Alaska. I’m no expert on the mechanicals and couldn’t care less; I’m in love with her….

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

(Pleasant sigh)

Expand full comment
Ice Nine's avatar

That’s a really nice car, excellent mods. What a 911 is supposed to be. Shall we start a pool as to what day some jerkoff asks for how many range 2 counts from the DME overrev report?

Hat tip to the Alaska plates, no one has figured that out yet, they all head to Montana….

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

That's very nice!

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Since this is a CAR-oriented stack not a TRUCK-oriented stack,

The obvious big news of the week is Porsche throwing in the towel on Macan and mid-engined/718 EVs. It's now hurry up and find a way to build new substructures to carry the fab 4.0 liter 6 on the 718's. I imagine it will be easier on the Macan. The math must have really not added up.

Imagine that, even us pussy Porsche Boxster/Cayman sports car guys didn't want an EV. I can't speak for anyone who wants an EV Macan and barely any who wated an ICE Macan, but that's a diff story.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

I know it's the dumbest thing since the "Frasier" reboot, but I'm madly in love with Boxsters and Caymans (the 'S' variety, gots to have at least one extra letter on the back, and it's more the Cayman versus the Boxster), but I don't fit in the 986 cars (left shoulder is into the rollbar mount), have no business buying a 987, and the wife loves the Macan.

I don't think I'll ever have either in the driveway.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

987 prices are rising.

Unless you're really fat, you can fit fine even at 6:4 or 5 in a 987 Cayman. Just don't go for the fixed bucket seats, which are expensive as hell and impossible to find.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

My head's in the roof a bit with the 987 Caymans. It's workable, I just have to be able to justify that kind of purchase, which at this point, I can't.

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

Somehow the 987 Caymans (and Boxsters for that matter) had this reputation of being hideous. I've always thought they were cool looking and never understood the knock against them. But then again, I used to have a 986 Boxster S, so anything 987 was quite an upgrade...

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

The Cayman was the last independent Porsche design before they got in with VW. The 987 was the only one of the mids that had a bespoke interior, the 986 shared with the 996, the 981/718 essentially got the corporate interior of the 997 era.

I don't know of anyone who thinks the 987 Cayman is hideous. The roofline and hips are gorgeous and have been widely praised. If you look at the stampings aside from the doors and hood shared with the 997, every single body panel is intricate compound curves.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

I suspect that the "hideous" tag came from...911 owners.

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

I'm guessing you're right.

If you ever listen to some of these Hagerty podcasts like Jason and Derek's, they love to trash on the 987's looks. I've never understood it.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

"Egad! My father was killed once by a 987, but he eventually recovered! Stay away!"

Expand full comment
Blake's avatar

I knew that Porsche would have to backtrack on its EV dreams (as did anyone else whose paycheck didn't depend on carbon cronyism or virtuous vanity). Let's just hope that it doesn't kill the company. I'd love to see the t-hybrid in a Cayman.

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

It’s crazy that they want to turn the EV platform into an ICE platform instead of keeping and/or improving the current ICE platform.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

They would have to admit they screwed up and that platform was already 10 years old. The ostensible reason for getting rid of it in the first place was it couldn't meet the EUs software security directives. They stopped selling them in the EU a year or more ago. That was always a lie of course, but they were hell bent on EVs to kowtow to Brussels and VW. It will be easier to create a new substructure that replaces the battery pack and combine it with the current 911 screens and telemetry crap than to go back to the old chassis that had NO development work on it to speak of for years.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

"Imagine that, even us pussy Porsche Boxster/Cayman sports car guys didn't want an EV."

Nobody ever thought they did. The purpose was to further elevate the 911, because the mooks at Porsche think they have 80% of Ferrari's brand equity and value instead of the 25% they actually have.

I had Dave Engelmann, who was running Porsche PR at the time, publicly tell me that people like me didn't mean enough to Porsche for the company to listen to our opinion. At the time I had an 18 month old Boxster S 550 and a 7 year old 911.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

"I had Dave Engelmann, who was running Porsche PR at the time, publicly tell me that people like me didn't mean enough to Porsche for the company to listen to our opinion. At the time I had an 18 month old Boxster S 550 and a 7 year old 911."

Yeah, that's the other side of Porsche I'm not too crazy about: No matter what I do, I'll be viewed as if I'm Cousin Eddie standing in the Porsche dealer lot, looking for a place to clean out my shitter. To that end, I'll just hang on to my white trash 5th gen Camaro and drive that until something typically GM-related happens to the car.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

You mean like my '22 Colorado, with less than 35,000 miles at this point, getting a fist through the touchscreen because it kept making unauthorized phone calls to random numbers in my Call History queue?

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

(Points in that direction like Bruce Willis in the movie "Bonfire of the Vanities")

Expand full comment
Shooter's avatar

This is the huge problem with the world today, we have so many more rich people living now, that these companies have zero incentive to serve the working class.

There is a butt for every $300,000 seat plus 50%.

Why build cars for the unwashed masses?

The “K” shaped economy is here.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

From "K cars" to "K-shaped economy" :(

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

I don't think so, I think the EV Boxster was supposed to elevate the Boxster by differentiating the power train from the 911. They screwed the pooch on separating the mid engined cars in 2017 using turbo 4s, which backfired. Buyers thought the 4cyl was downscale and Subie-like, never mind the engine was terrific (I had one). So they had buyers coming in who (1) liked sports cars and driving them quickly, who (2) made the rich dentist who wanted a "sports car" and got a 911 look dumb, and (3) drove the brand in the opposite direction than they intended.

By 2021 they admitted they were lying about the 4 cylinder in the first place (emissions, packaging issues) and lopped the turbo off the 3.0 liter in the Carrera, bored it out to 4 liters and magically made it fit the 718. Now they had an engine that the 911 didn't have, a NA 6 cylinder that they later cranked up to almost 500 HP for the GT4 RS and Spyder RS, both of which got into 911 price territory. Mind you, these were cars basically designed by the end of 2016 with the 981 GT4. They let the Boxster GTS and Cayman GTS stick around until last month at least partially by shamelessly raising prices into the $130,000s when optioned "right."

The EV Boxster would have pitched the "brand" at the saddo who wanted to be seen in a Tesla without associating with Elon, AND who wouldn't buy a 911 with a nasty ICE anyways. When they planned it EVs were seen as goosing the "brand" , now it's the other way. Hence the 180° turnaround.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Yeah, I can see that, but I also know that there are insane people at Porsche who think the 911 can eventually sell for 296 GTB money, and that therefore the Cayman will sell for 911 money, and so on.

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

Give me a Nissan Z instead. I almost never see them but I notice them when I do. I don’t notice 911’s anymore.

Too bad Nissan doesn’t offer a bunch of colors for the Z like the 911 has.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Anyone who drives the current Z for 50 miles will want to buy one.

It is exactly what the 280ZX Turbo was: faster than 95% of the traffic around you with a great ride and plenty of features. The people who gripe about it being an old platform are demented. Nobody can name a single good thing about "new platforms" since 2015.

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

That “old platform” line is just a recurring tiresome theme in car reviews that is then repeated online ad nauseum. I just ignore it.

I finally saw a Z here in Hooterville. I think they’re great. How come Nissan can integrate a screen tastefully into the dash and no other car company can?

I just happened to see an original 240Z a few months ago at my local Publix. I forgot just how small that car was. But wow are they beautiful! This one was a beater that one of the kids working at Publix was driving, but what a looker.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

OLD PLATFORMS:

Porsche 901

Saab 99/900

Range Rover

Volvo 200

Ford Panther

Ford Falcon

Chrysler LA/LC

Mini

VW Type 1

What's not to like?

Expand full comment
Nplus1's avatar

Every Macan EV I've seen on the lot is something like $130k. Who is going to pay that for a compact crossover?

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

Rich Californians?

Expand full comment
Nplus1's avatar

Maybe for their daughters.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-lost-generation/

Im somewhat shocked theres no commentary on this that has been making the rounds.

Expand full comment
Gianni's avatar

I just saw Taibbi posting about it on his stack.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

Yes, another important article; sadly overshadowed by Vivek's antics. Pairs well with https://www.compactmag.com/article/no-there-arent-good-h-1b-visas/

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

Even this comment section bears this out. The Boomers are largely exempt from and largely unconcerned with both of these issues, and even are defensive "Well *I* was able to build a business/career, so shut up! Everything's fine!"

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

god they just never learn huh

horse and water and drinking and all that

Expand full comment
Charlie's avatar

I think the reason for the lack of discourse, is what else is there to add? The progressive talking heads and echo chamber won't touch or acknowledge it, and any white guy 55 or younger that's worked in any corporate environment the past two decades reads it, shrugs his shoulders and says "yep". It's not new info to any of us.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

Agreed; I think the discussion is less about substance but about impact. Scott Galloway has been quietly discussing the fact that young men are NOT alright, and coming close to admitting why. And this week, even the NYT has been discussing the article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/16/opinion/young-white-men-discrimination.html

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

It’s obviously been happening since way before 2014. What i do find funny is these spicey liberal white guys got hoisted on their own petard and never thought affirmative action would harm them.

We have millennial women wondering where all their romantic prospects are when they literally took their jobs. Turns out girls dont really like guys they out earn.

And all of this was flipping obvious in 2009!

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

"Turns out girls dont really like guys they out earn."

And yet women without college degrees are married at lower rates than women with college degrees....

https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2025/02/struggling-men-hurt-noncollege-womens-marriage-prospects

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Because theyre fat. And that doesnt adress what i said at all. Women prefer guys who make more. The lower class millennial white guys also getting screwed doesnt change that

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

everyone talks about dollar inflation and house inflation but nobody has the guts to discuss the real insidious threat

woman inflation

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

It is both ABSOLUTE earnings and RELATIVE earnings

A woman who makes $35k wants a man who makes $75k so her children won't live in poverty. A woman who makes $75k wants a man who earns $150k because she doesn't want to marry "down."

Between DEI and H-1B, women have been elevated and young men have been crushed, leaving the average woman with far fewer men out-earning her than would have otherwise been the case.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

It’s also hard to jump classes. Every middle and upper middle class millennials i grew up with went to college. Beauty school dropout is marrrying a plumber or a welder not an accountant.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

That, and women are better equipped to play in the cat box that is modern corporate America. I work with at least two women who were both single AND homeowners in their mid-20s, largely because as women, they curried favor with The System more easily than men.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Poor people don't marry, and don't stay married. This Sunday we will likely discuss the "American castes" study; the disparities in marriage are astounding across classes.

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

That's the myth of America, isn't it? That we area classless society?

I often look at policies that are considered racist and certainly some are, but mostly they're actually classist.

Expand full comment
Nplus1's avatar

I think we are all smart enough to realize multiple variables are in play but that there can be a relationship between relative incomes in a couple and likely long-term success.

Expand full comment
JasonS's avatar

"Reviewing historical data from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey, they examined outcomes at age 45 for women born between 1930 and 1980. Marriage rates remained remarkably stable among college-educated women, holding above 70%, but dropped sharply among those without degrees – from 78.7% to 52.4%.".

This data is older than I am. Anecdotally, non college women have married 2 to 1 over the college women in my circle. Then again I do live in the south. I'd love to see current data.

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

"outcomes at age 45 for women born between 1930 and 1980"

Uh, 1980+45 is 2025...that *is* current data. :)

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

All you Amy Acton fan-girls should think about how much she cares about young white men.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar
19hEdited

does vivek?

not advocating for either

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

Yes. His social media is filled with Charlie Kirk style college interactions. Plenty of evidence out there for someone interested in learning about him to make up their mind.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

He just exploits Charlie Kirk's memory. Vivek would love for EVERY SINGLE JOB to be taken by a fellow Hindu Indian.

EDIT: fixed typo

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

"Greetings fellow whites "

Expand full comment
JasonS's avatar

Pre-presisential run Vivek was so much better. I'm still not a huge fan.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

If I'm living in Ohio, I'm penciling in "Turd Sandwich".

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

Richard Petty. Or Optimus Prime.

Expand full comment
Nplus1's avatar

At this point, I might write in "panhandler on East 4th".

Expand full comment
bluebarchetta's avatar

To hell with "Lockdown" Amy Achtung. The bitches love her, though, so she's going to win.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Any sane Republican could beat her. It didn't have to be Jim Tressel. It could have been any man who could attend a debate without smirking like he was about to conquer a foreign country.

Expand full comment
Nplus1's avatar

We have to be less than 10 years from a LeBron governorship, no? He'll do it remotely from Brentwood.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

"smirking like he was about to conquer a foreign country"

🎯

Expand full comment
Erik's avatar

And then everybody is surprised that they are becoming enthusiastic about the small moustache brigade. A disaster in the making that could easily have been averted.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

weimar solutions and problems etc

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

I've read that, and a couple of accompanying rebuttals.

My favorite blurb out of the whole piece here, though?

"Back in 2016, Brown had pledged to double faculty diversity within six years."

Hmm. Literally browning the faculty.

Beyond that, however, one other recurring theme stands out: The Boomers get to keep their jobs.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

yup

"we need fewer white guys but im not going to retire or quit"

fucking cowards

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

My father is a boomer and he was in line for a professorship the year that affirmative action was passed... You can guess what happened next.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

My dad could teach college-level courses on the American Revolution from memory, because he's a passionate historian and a voracious reader who's been studying the matter since the mid-50s. Probably owns 1,500 books on the subject.

BUT he's also a former Marine who hates communists, so he couldn't get a job on a university faculty ANYWHERE back when it would've made a difference in our lives.

Expand full comment
Nplus1's avatar

There were boomers that were screwed by affirmative action. My born in '52 dad has talked about getting rejected from jobs explicitly because he's white. That's how he ended up selling shop machinery for his father, selling men's clothing, and eventually selling Buicks. None of those were excluding white guys. Still, it has to be worse now.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

The owners (husband and wife team plus whatever silent partners were involved) of one of the assisted living facility chain locations the spouse and I managed, they were Boomers that literally stayed in the game until the husband just stopped functioning entirely (ironically from dementia, this guy was actually driving the wife around in a Macan GTS up until a year ago while he was zoned out of his mind, she walked as if she was already in memory care), and the wife was the real terror of the pair, absolutely horrifying to listen to during Zoom/Team meetings, it was as if state and federal laws were things that existed only for other people, and she repeatedly threw temper tantrums if someone dared tell her that something was illegal/wouldn't work because of impossible logistical problems.

We've been running into this everywhere, regardless of the business (although the medical industry is a great place for these people to hide, especially the Boomer girlbosses), retirement or dying doesn't register to these people as something that happens to them, they're the same disgusting sociopathic/psychopathic people all the way until they drop, the entire outside world exists only to service them.

Expand full comment
JasonS's avatar

Why should he? Has the young generation been so coddled that they don't understand people are going to self preserve. Just wait 40 years. Heck, 20 years.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

on the one hand some of these guys were in favour of "giving someone else a chance" and on the other hand they were doing everything they could to keep their job

not curbstomping young white dudes at every opportunity isnt coddling them

Expand full comment
Gianni's avatar
20hEdited

The last couple of paragraphs where he blames himself for not settling or not working harder vs his liberal world view that sold him a bill of goods and f’d him over is really lame.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

hes so close yet so far from getting it

Expand full comment
Gianni's avatar

Feels like the same kind of person that thanks their former employer on Linked In for laying them off.

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

Seeing that is what makes the article so powerful.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Thats why it’s so funny. These guys cant possibly admit “we were wrong”

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

After seeing a few hundred or thousand of these folks on LinkedIn and other places, all with the same story, it's like they're midwits who are educated waaaay beyond their intelligence level and grasp even the most simple of patterns, and are always on the outside intellectually, looking in.

The laughable, Catch-22 part of it all is that I've been blocked from employment by these same people for years, but when it happens to them?

"I don't understand!"

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Exactly. Like, these guys were laughing at everyone else in 2014 “they took our jerbs” and its 2025 and theyre like “wait, they took our jobs”

Am i angry about the situation? Mildly. I did fine so im not that mad. I pivoted, got a job with the family business and started a family. But was it obvious it was happening? Yes. Yes it was

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

It was a blessing for you, Scott, in the same way that being a hard-head and not going to college in 1981 when I had a scholarship lined up was good for me in the end.

You have your own business, you're living the American dream. You're much, much better insulated from the vagaries and whims of corporate culture.

Consider our friend Jack, and his "colorful" employment history. It makes for good stories -- but it isn't a reality that you or I (or one presumes, Jack) would choose as a way to move through life. Running your own thing is the last chance to be free in this nation, and I'd never have done it had I gone to school, and you'd never have done It if you'd had a fair shake like the college boys of my generation did.

Count your blessings. You coulda' been one of them.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Honestly getting screwed by corporate America is the best thing that ever happened to me but i still have sympathy for all the guys who didnt have the backup plan. Id probably be making 150k working for some company who hates me working for some girlboss i tutored in college.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Here's the supreme irony: any time *anyone* makes an accusation of any sort of system-wide problem, be it racism or sexism or discrimination, someone always makes a nasty comment about "others made it, you just didn't try hard enough."

"There's no discrimination against Black people! Magic Johnson is rich!"

So this fellow, after detailing a system that ruthlessly eliminates all but the 10% of Millennial white men that the girlbosses squirm in their seats over, blames himself for not being one of the ten percent.

Listen, I know, ahem, a convicted violent felon who has made millions of dollars in Corporate America and often wears a $9,000 cashmere Brioni overcoat with a Turnbull&Asser bespoke shirt. But this, ahem, fellow is not stupid enough to claim that his personal history doesn't mean it's almost impossible for convicted violent felons to rise above the poverty line.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

My God, there's 2 of you?

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

allegedly there was a brother bark but ive never seen both of them in the same room together

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

The saddest thing is the feds should go after them hard. But they wont do shit. They didnt do shit about the covid tyrants and they won’t do shit about the decade plus of civil rights violations. My take as a millennial is the civil rights act was an excuse to discriminate against my generation. People think this is progress?

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

its progressively worse but thats about the only kind of progress

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

Scott Galloway correctly points out that it isn't against *your generation*, or even the majority of *your generation*: only the 24% who aren't women, "of color," or LGBT++:

https://www.wsj.com/video/scott-galloway-sees-issues-with-dei/3B1C6C28-00A0-4DE5-9203-F0B14056655B

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

Responses like this are why most of the twitter discussion I've seen of the article features people calling for war crimes

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

Can you clarify?

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

People trying to minimize this, or like the dude in the wsj video, say we just need to discriminate differently to ensure we have the 'right' kind of diversity, I think really reinforce the impression of most core millennials I know that meritocracy is dead. You have the choice of adopting racial tribalism or continuing to get fucked by a system that steals from you and then uses your own money to stack the deck against you.

Go check some twitter discussions on this and that sentiment tends come out as "this is a fundamental betrayal of a generation of citizens in this country, perhaps we should look to the medieval past for a suitable punishment for those responsible, and maybe we should do some shit that clarifies to people that this behavior is unwelcome in our country going forward". Or words to that effect

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

based

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

Only if we get cool serb-style propaganda videos

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

Progress towards the country unraveling

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Itd be nice to have a somewhat meritocracy again. Not sure if it’s even possible

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

It comes down to those in favor of the meritocracy vs. the clinically insane people in positions of power in corporations and in government. It will be a struggle, but we must marginalize the insane people.

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

Kinda hard to bring back at this point

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

There needs to be discussion on this. It's a wild read

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

strong agree

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

I read it. It made me mad.

Expand full comment
Slowtege's avatar

I've read excerpts from it (quoted in other pieces) and don't want to read it because 1) I know more or less that it is going on and has gone on and 2) I don't want nor need any kindling on the emotional fire. I live this reality and have been increasingly baffled and frustrated by all of it. Many a prayer--half of them very, very frustrated--over this. But then, I've known something was off with my section of my (Millennial) generation for well over a decade. We received the trailing end of "work hard, go to college, get established in a career, succeed" line from our boomer parents et al. We got a recession, we got all this other junk, and for those of us that needed maybe a touch more in our favor with the opposite sex, instead we got the height of the feminism indoctrination. After putting myself through an extremely difficult major, I got out in 2010, was finally able to find a job, and started plugging away. The career path was on course enough, and while cracks were forming in the professional/hiring world (I was looking for other work), it was 2020 that really nuked things and exposed so much of the world for the farce that it was and increasingly is. So this article is essentially telling me I [freaking] knew it[!].

There are days or moments, because of this, where I am putting weights on the cast iron door that sits above the cauldron of anger so that it doesn't over-pressurize. There are other days where I am at peace with my reality, and that is greatly aided by my desire to not be ruled by emotion and my submission to a higher power and authority (Christ). It does not invalidate what I feel though.

The solution(s) I and others propose to this are not enjoyable. They are very uncomfortable. The questions are very uncomfortable. The conversations are very uncomfortable. I can't have them with my conservative boomer dad. I can't have them with my siblings (all younger). Reflexive recoiling and shutting down. I also don't want to with two of those siblings because I want to spare them the burden and harm from ever having to think that heavily of the situation, as a protection. My dad read it and was like, yeah, the best option is to make the best of it and not be victims. No time to internalize the written manifestation of a long-held theory now revealed as reality, no time to mourn or grieve those implications or the lost prime years of income, nor the massive mental and emotional toll that such a reality has taken on our oft-linked (as men) value and societal self-worth. Of course, we are not the only generation to experience setbacks of any sort; I am not whining. I am giving voice and validation to what I, and what people in the past have thought and felt. Past generations have had it plenty bad, but have been brow-beaten into not externalizing it because it wasn't "manly."

Take this in. Sit with it. Process it. Commit or recommit to our values and convictions. Determine a possible course or courses of action. Then we move forward, together.

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

I'm on the tail end of my career, rather than in the middle of it. Like you, I committed my ways to the LORD at a young age. My trajectory in living a life of faith in the modern world has been marked by more "over" and "mis" steps than by disobedience or a lack of faith, and yet... I am decidedly human. Part of being a human male is to desire to work and produce and provide. There is a social standing derived from vocation that cannot be overstated.

I've made money over the years -- what I think of as a lot of money, but what others think of as "jerb money". I'm happy that I was able to physically work for it, rather than obtain it through trading or symbol manipulation or investment. But I know (like REALLY KNOW) that every nice thing I have, every "normal" thing I enjoy, is not a birthright or the result of my efforts -- it's a blessing. I've lived in the 3rd world, and I know that people all over this blue ball work from the time they are born until the time they die. They arrive empty handed and they go back to dust the same way. It is the way of man.

And yet, my generation (I was born in '63, so I'm still technically a boomer) has upended every working model they ever found: the nuclear family, the extended family, how to raise children, what it means to produce things, what "work" means, etc. We have robbed (literally) from future generations to pay for the things we wanted, or imagined we wanted now.

We've imported slave labor to take care of our domestic and menial chores -- first nannies, then landscapers, then farm and construction workers, etc. They were "doing the jobs Americans (meaning Boomers) don't want". It didn't blow up on most of us, so we kept at it -- bringing in people from Asia and the Asian subcontinent because "not enough Americans are engineers or STEM grads". We traded freely with everybody (even our enemies), because "free trade is good trade". We rammed "strength through diversity" down everybody's throats, but made sure there was no diversity of thought tolerated in the classroom or shop floor or in the "open plan office".

The net/net of this is that Boomers consistently enjoyed ALL of the benefits of cheap labor, cheap goods, cheap trade, cheap housing, etc., all while pulling up the ladder behind them for a generation of adolescent males trying hard to be men.

To be sure, the misogyny, bigotry, sense of entitlement, etc. that marked my Dad's generation was generally eradicated from the workplace, and this is a good thing. But the pendulum long ago swung past the center-mark and sliced neatly through a lot of the slender threads that make society work. Men have provided for and protected women and children since the dawn of humanity -- it's how God made us. When material sustenance flows backwards, through the hands of women to men, it infantilizes them -- until they sit on the couch and game all day and night, detached from reality and responsibility, frozen in amber at 13.

I have no idea how it worked out this way, but my own family looks more like my grandfathers' in some ways than my own parents'. My wife never worked outside the home. There were plenty of moments of sheer terror and resentment that everything seemed to depend on me. But in the end, everything very much depended on God, and he is altogether dependable.

I'm so sorry that you can't talk to anybody about this -- that your dad can only offer, "suck it up" as a platitude, but in some ways he's right. He doesn't know what to tell you to do, because you are living a reality he never did. There really ISN'T anything to do except to bear the burden that's been laid on your shoulders by... well, everybody. My only advice is to keep your head up, looking for opportunity to take reasonable risk, because that's what the parable of the talents is really speaking to -- taking risks. When you have less than you should, risking is hard, but the day my life changed was the day I stepped off the "30 and out" treadmill of being a worker bee in a skilled trade hive, and hung out my own shingle.

I overpaid for everything -- bought my way out of a "not to compete" with 2 years of profit -- and borrowed more money than I had needed to buy the home I was living in. But that day was the day everything changed for me professionally. I was no longer somebody's "boy", I was my own man. I'm not sure if your skill has that opportunity or not, but being beholden to nobody else is the place I'd try to get if I were you.

... and God is with you. Commit all of this to Him: build whatever rainy day fund is possible, and then strike when the opportunity presents itself. The deck is absolutely stacked against you, but the world shall not overcome you.

God bless you, brother.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

very wise words

thank you for posting them

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

I was going to bring it up, but I don't know what to say other than: he is dead right, but the chattering-class media is fake and lame and grown men shouldn't be trying to join it anyway.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

I need your wordcel skills to point out the obvious i can’t enunciate.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

felt that in my soul

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

I'd go a couple of steps further backward and hit up various media types like Fred Allen from the later days of radio (he didn't make it too far when TV came out, he was possibly the very first TV celebrity to actually have a face for radio).

If you're trying to overpower someone with astounding yet insulting prose and also confuse the hell out of them at the same time, start readin' the written works of folks from the 1920's and 1930's (Arthur Weigall talked soooo much shit about the Egyptians and Germans in "The Glory of the Pharoahs", published 1923), or better yet, focus on proper British humor/insults (the Goon Squad is a great start, or even Terry Pratchett), they have at least a thousand more years of misery versus Americans in which they honed their literary and language craft, these people know how to freaking insult and overpower with the written word.

Don't bother going as far back as Twain, he comes across as someone who's merely half-assing his way through insulting various people and cultures.

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

Re: Sam Clemens:

100%

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

"but the chattering-class media is fake and lame and grown men shouldn't be trying to join it anyway."

(Displays half-confused, half-disgusted countenance in regards to why anyone was losing any sleep about being excluded from those types of institutional antiques, I figured out I wasn't wanted fairly early and thus didn't blow an education on trying to join a closed club)

Expand full comment
bluebarchetta's avatar

The question is: how deeply has this DEI/"get Whitey" thinking infected non-media professions? Have young white males been blacklisted in...oh, let's say...engineering?

My son graduates in six months. We're about to find out. I pray daily he finds good work immediately. That might be just what it takes to de-radicalize me. Because ever since the Covidiocy, man, am I angry.

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

My son is 35, white, smart, even-keeled in a way his dad isn't.

He had a tough time breaking in -- but once through the door, has excelled. He's got girl-bosses for sure, but don't underestimate your son's ability to navigate the "new normal" in ways that you and I cannot.

Things that lock me up with anger roll off his back, because he's so used to needing to be better than his peers, that it's just part of who he is. And during the next "correction", it will still be merit that keeps a job in a big company, no matter how much nonsense the big company HR department has been spewing.

Engineering, accounting, and finance (and OBVIOUSLY, the skilled trades) are the last best hopes for competent young men to rise above the noise.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

In the same way that I've known a few Gen X women who used their sex appeal to become executives, the Gen Z male executive will be someone whom women want to fuck.

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

You may be right. I'd have been SOL had I been born into that reality. Just flatly SOL.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

I would say that understanding women has put an extra half million dollars into my pocket over the years. Of course, I've spent it all and then some.

Expand full comment
Henry C.'s avatar

Yes, it has. Men can call each other out for stupid behavior that you have to tiptoe around with women or God forbid non white women. And old white simps will go to the mat for them.

Expand full comment
Nplus1's avatar

There is one person in the article who realizes that after a few years working as a journalist. He says something like, "I'm not a particularly manly man but I realized I was the most masculine person around here and didn't fit in."

Expand full comment
JasonS's avatar

A good write up, but I don't like the overly broad strokes. I'm a Millennial "technically" and I have had a far different experience than millennials 5 years or even 10 years younger than me. Talking about folks in the Gen-x or millennial category is a bit reductive.

The way this is written one would think I hit the Millennial jackpot then. Granted, I'm not in a journalism field, but I saw that in the mid twenty-teens the was a huge push for diversity in engineering and sciences. It's more outcome driven and not in the spotlight like writers and media types are.

Expand full comment
JasonS's avatar

I hate to reply again to this:

"He blamed the older generation of white men who pulled up the ladder behind them. And he was right to"

Wrong. The very cohorts of this writer forced, via social and economic pressures, for this GenX white dude to roll up the ladder. Does the genX dude care he's white? No. Does he care about his paycheck and what the studios are directing? Absolutely. And where does it come from? This writers very peers whining about diversity.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Shameless plug number 2:

https://auto-europe-sales.ebizautos.com/details-2012-porsche-cayman-well_maintained_and_optioned_cayman_r_-used-wp0ab2a88cu792183.html

This will go on BAT early next year. Presently on consignment with the local Lotus dealer and Indy shop that knows it well. 39,000 miles, carbon fiber buckets, 6sp, Peridot Green, the perfect Cayman R trifecta.

Avoidable Contact note, the first time I met Jack was at Grattan, a Michigan track. The organizer pulled some favors and got the state troopers to look the other way, this was May,

2020. We got together for a couple days of get on the track and go.

Jack told me I had very good taste in cars, and that he could find me a couple of seconds. This is that car folks.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

C R I S P

lawd it looks good

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

Ooooh, pretty.

Expand full comment
Shooter's avatar

Gawd Damn!

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

Vivek pulled a stereotypical "allow me to explain your country's identity to you and how it includes me" in today's New York Times. An important response: https://news.gab.com/2025/12/vivek-ramaswamy-is-wrong-about-everything/

Expand full comment
Sherman McCoy's avatar

Sir, do you identify as a Heritage American?

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar
21hEdited

I sure do. It's like a heritage turkey or a heritage grain, except cute chicks don't gloat over me at the farmer's market.

That may be my first brush with Andrew Torba. He seems to be quite comfortable leaning on the racism fence.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Torba is an unapologetic Christian nationalist.

The "Christian" part is important to emphasize. He appears to bear no ill will towards people of other races. He simply doesn't want them in America, the same way most Chinese or Japanese or Nigerians don't want more foreigners in their country.

I never fail to chuckle when I see him end something with "Christ Is King". Unfortunately we now live in a world where at least 45% of Americans read "Christ Is King" as "Fuck You, Bitch," which is, I think, how Torba means it.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

"The "Christian" part is important to emphasize. He appears to bear no ill will towards people of other races. He simply doesn't want them in America, the same way most Chinese or Japanese or Nigerians don't want more foreigners in their country."

responding to this becuase of how very true it is and how most people have no idea what people mean by it

telling a group of people to be your best and most successful selves in your own country isnt hateful

Expand full comment
Ronnie Schreiber's avatar

My father's family has been in this country since the 1840s. Does that give me standing to discuss American identity? I do like hot dogs, apple pie, baseball, and Detroit style coneys.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

From my perspective, certainly!

And 1840 was long before United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind (1923) and a full century before Luce–Celler (1946), which increased the annual quota of Indian immigration from ZERO to 100/year (which was considered a significant change).

I don't see the Jewish community benefitting from mass migration of Muslims or Indians:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyvxke3wgko

"Bondi Beach gunman originally from India, police say"

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

very annoying how a muslim can gun down a jew in the latest salvo of a millennia old semetic feud and somehow the white guy gets the punishment

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

But they still don't know the attackers' motives!

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

"I don't see the Jewish community benefitting from mass migration of Muslims or Indians:"

Bondi Beach gunman was stopped by an unarmed Muslim, actually...so....

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

and if there werent any muslims there at all there wouldnt even be a shooting

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

Correct, because Australia isn't a US school!

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

The shooter was an Indian Muslim

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

Two shooters. The father, Indian immigrant. The son was born in Australia (so Indian heritage but not an immigrant).

And the guy who tackled one of them while unarmed was apparently a Syrian Muslim.

And the Australian cop who shot them, killing the father, apparently did so from 40 meters away with a handgun, which is a hell of a shot when under stress...props to him....

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

I read he was a Christian Maronite.

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

Probably early reporting--Guardian, Al-jazeera, CBS, and Fox call him a Muslim; CNN doesn't seem to mention his religion either way.

Expand full comment
sgeffe's avatar

Ronnie, which Coney? And briefly, what are the differences between the two, found next door to one another?

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

now youre asking the good questions

Expand full comment
Ronnie Schreiber's avatar

I couldn't tell you, neither is kosher. Some friends of mine ran a kosher coney place for a while.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Lafayette gets more disgusting inspection reports leading to closures. American is bigger, probably not as good but less likely to make you ill.

2 coneys +fries is a good meal once a year.

Expand full comment
Wyatt LCB's avatar

DULYS!

Expand full comment
Amelius Moss's avatar

I try to make it there every time I'm in town.

Expand full comment
Wyatt LCB's avatar

Drop me a line next time!

Expand full comment
Sherman McCoy's avatar

I’m sorry, that does not meet MY elevated standards with regard to Heritage American identity.

I am the direct descendant of a signatory of the Declaration of Independence.

Therefore, unless any of you have inherited similar credentials, you must defer to my point of view, which is that Vivek is correct and that we don’t need DEI for white people who were born in America.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

not even one of the original settlers from the mayflower?

im calling ice on you

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

Well my fore-bearers WERE on the Mayflower, so I trump Sherman.

Expand full comment
Sherman McCoy's avatar

Did they sign the Declaration of Independence?

Were they just “in” what became America or did they actually create value?

Expand full comment
ScottM's avatar

My family arrived in Charleston around 1690, but unfortunately were not available to sign the Declaration. They did manage to make a lot of money and have a county named after us in Tennessee. We lost it all after the War of Northern Aggression and became poor white trash until my father became the first to attend college after the fall. I am Heritage American and am damn proud of it.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Im heritage canadian. Yikes

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

sorry to hear that

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

You’re Siberian-Canadian? Like a walk across the Bering land bridge Canadian?

If so, good genes! Congrats!

Expand full comment
Sherman McCoy's avatar

While that’s admirable, it does not meet my standards. I’m sorry.

You must be the most “Heritagest” American imaginable to commentate with authority on this topic. Like me.

Perhaps anyone who is not part of the blood and soil of the founding fathers should just fuck off back to wherever they came from?

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

i guess we both agree with lincoln on remigration then

Expand full comment
T Michaels's avatar

Time to make common cause with our Native American friends!

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

Unfortunately, since you turned your back on your own people and don’t own a pickup, your heritage card has been revoked.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

The family of my oldest friend was once wealthy and owned several thousand acres throughout western Pennsylvania. Until the Great Depression hit.

They were wiped out and gradually sold off the land to stay afloat, the last few acres going on the market upon the death of my friend's grandmother.

She didn't trust banks. When they were cleaning out her house, they found about a quarter-million in cash in an old dryer in the basement.

Some of the bills dated back to 1930.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Lol. Youre a nepo baby too.

Expand full comment
Amelius Moss's avatar

9th Great Grandfather Isaac Willey landed in Boston circa 1630 and in 1645 settled New London, CT with John Winthrop Jr.

Just before my GTI reached it's untimely end I had left the gravesite of his descendant, Absalom Willey, my 3rd G Grandfather. His Grandfather, also named Absalom, was with Washington crossing the Delaware Christmas 1776.

Also part of the family is Waitman Willey, one of the founders of West Virginia. My own personal opinion though is WV would have been better off left part of Virginia so I consider him the Black Sheep.

Expand full comment
Hex168's avatar

I checked with my wife, who is a direct descendant of one of the signers of the VT constitution (pre-dating the US constitution) and she disagrees with your point of view. Does that count?

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

It's fun watching Sherman rediscover and implement the fallacy of the beard in real time, please say nothing.

Expand full comment
Terry Murray's avatar

My tenth great-grandfather was on the Mayflower. Another came in 1628 and founded Lynn, Mass. Which all means absolutely nothing other than an interesting fact

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

You + Me means Sherman has to buy us cigars.

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

I'm going to need to see the 23 and Me report before I can trust your claims as fact.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

It's going to contain 11% dog DNA.

Expand full comment
Nplus1's avatar

One of his great-grandmothers would have been a popular content creator.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar
19hEdited

I'm third-generation Native American myself.

Both sides of my family have been Americans for at least three generations. My mom's grandfather brought his family to the New World in the late 1800s and forbade then from ever speaking German again, as they were Americans now. My dad's folk showed up sometime between the War of 1812 and the annexation of Texas, as Ireland had become too something-or-other for them. Poor, I guess.

I was born in Jersey. How ya fuckin' doin'?

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

"I was born in Jersey"

so youre actually italian is what youre saying

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

Sorry, hills of north Jersey. As in, I lived two miles from Action Park till I was 10.

Which actually goes a long way toward explaining why I am the way I am. That whole area was full of high-powered microwave towers and leaded water and radon and at least one abandoned quarry where they wanted to dump all that radioactive dirt.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

wait is that the same action park that injured a shitload of kids?

Expand full comment
Joe griffin's avatar

Lmao😂

Expand full comment
Gianni's avatar
17hEdited

My grandmother was born in Southwest Washington State in 1901 in a German community and didn’t learn English until she went to school. There were a lot of German speakers and cultural societies in Southwest Washington until around 1914

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

"My mom's grandfather brought his family to the New World in the late 1800s and forbade then from ever speaking German again, as they were Americans now."

My mom and her side of the family are from Estonia, so from her side of things, I'm her firstborn American offspring.

And yes, I didn't learn but maybe two or three words in Estonian the entire time.

And also yes, I wasn't too terribly impressed with my grandmother's side of the family in Estonia (freaking financial parasites), so after a point, I stopped caring.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

"My father's family has been in this country since the 1840s. Does that give me standing to discuss American identity?"

No.

If your family had been in this country since the 1839's, however, yes, you'd be welcomed with open arms to discuss American identity.

Expand full comment
Steve Ward's avatar

And what the hell are you implying by that comment?

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

sherman is accusing him of being indian

or something

Expand full comment
Sherman McCoy's avatar

I have established above that my Heritage American bona fides are not in question. Unless you are ALSO a direct descendant of one of Founding Fathers - like me - you must defer to my superior perspective on this subject.

Expand full comment
KoR's avatar

My own lineage being entirely indecipherable beyond two or three generations, what if I went to a public university named after one of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence. Does that count?

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Unlike sherman, you have had sex. With a lady. American!

Expand full comment
Henry C.'s avatar

On the premises.

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

I bet they'd be ashamed.

You're not the only one here who can trace their family's presence here to before the revolution.

Expand full comment
Sherman McCoy's avatar

Of which Founding Father are you a direct descendant?

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

None of them, nor did I so claim. Simply that my family has been here since the 1600s. One of my ancestors fought under Washington in the revolutionary war.

I shall use this perch of similar moral superiority to declare that non Anglo immigration was a mistake.

Expand full comment
Landon McMeekin's avatar

Benedict Arnold's Heritage American bona fides were also not in question, and he sold out this country like the self-centered son-of-a-bitch he was. Maybe I'm making your point for you here; I'm not sure. I'll just say that it's frankly risible for you of all people to pretend you're an authority on all things American.

Expand full comment
Sherman McCoy's avatar

Based on the beliefs of this group - Heritage = GOOD, Other = BAD - I am the authority.

And yet the nattering nabobs purport to argue with me regarding Heritage America.

Expand full comment
Landon McMeekin's avatar

The problem with you using the term "nabob" is that you're the only one of those here. Nabobs, to the best of my knowledge, are persons with a shitload of money and fuck-all else to justify their existence, which describes you down to a T.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

My father was killed once by a nabob.

He eventually recovered, but spent many years after his death walking around like the one guy in that one Bug Bunny cartoon, repeating the name "Hansel?" several times before walking off the cartoon, stage right.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

i dont but vivek is still a retard

Expand full comment
KoR's avatar

Certainly says something that in the current Trump admin made up of exclusively con-men and grifters, he somehow couldn’t manage to stick around in any real capacity.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

not everyone is cut out for the big leagues

Expand full comment
Sherman McCoy's avatar

He is just too virtuous. Too smart.

He will be President one day.

Expand full comment
KoR's avatar

The first president to know 75% of the words to “Lose Yourself”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaGb5ooswYA

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

imagine how much more interesting presidential debates would be if there was a battle rap portion

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

At least if americas future ever relies on winning a spelling bee instead of a war, we got a guy

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

"He will be President one day."

I'm hoping it will be President of a local chapter of Daughters of the American Revolution.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Under Vivek, the membership will look like the membership of "ITServe".

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

"Certainly says something that in the current Trump admin made up of exclusively con-men and grifters, he somehow couldn’t manage to stick around in any real capacity."

"Sorry, but we have actual standards around these here parts of the White House!"

Expand full comment
Steve Ward's avatar

Worse

Expand full comment
Landon McMeekin's avatar

You, sir, are my favorite Snow Mexican of all time, eclipsing such eminences as Gordon Lightfoot, 80% of The Band, and a significant proportion of the Guess Who.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

thanks heaps

consider me deeply flattered to be compared to such luminaries

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

I like him more now that I know this new and delightful nickname!

Expand full comment
Rick T.'s avatar

I’ll also rank you ahead of them but slightly behind Ferguson Jenkins. ;-)

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

dont know who that is but i appreciate the comment nonetheless

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

How has this guy even gotten to the point where he was a potential candidate for president and now running for Governor of Ohio? Even leaving aside my read of his vibe, his track record just says out loud that he's shady sales dude.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

Probably kickstarted his campaigns by self-funding.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

I think everyone assumed that Jim Tressel would allow himself to be crowned Governor For Life; when he declined, it became a battle of the third-tier grifters.

It's astounding that Tressel wouldn't take the job. We wouldn't even need the formality of an election.

Expand full comment
MD Streeter's avatar

I'd have moved back to Ohio if Jim Tressel became governor.

No, actually I'd hope that someone on his staff would come up here to be a successful governor, much like how Mark Dantonio came to MSU and coached them into the playoff that one year and beat scUM on the regular.

Expand full comment
bluebarchetta's avatar

It speaks volumes that Jim Tressel - who thrived in the world of NCAA football - looked at politics and said "No thanks, that's too corrupt."

It's a shame. Everyone knows the great things he accomplished at Ohio State, but he also did great things as president of Youngstown State.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Hell, he was the man who took the rap for "Tattoogate"!

Although from what my OSU football player acquaintances say, John Cooper was the worst in that regard.

Expand full comment
Nplus1's avatar

I really don't think he was corrupt in any way. Nothing his players did was really that bad. Just like the Reggie Bush stuff.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

Regarding "his people," Vivek was slated to be the keynote speaker at the ITServe convention, but pulled out at the last minute. Aside from whether ITServe violates RICO and FARA, notice anything about its the leadership? This is what Vivek's "meritocracy" looks like:

https://itserve.org/leadership-2025/

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

They charge a thousand bucks to be a member... it's a meta-parasite, like the wasps inside the fleas.

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

Fun fact, Vivek and Pete Buttigieg were both on camera organically asking questions on the same msnbc 2004 Hardball college tour, what are the odds of THAT! The mind wobbles…

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

https://xcancel.com/AuronMacintyre/status/2001460726733414895#m

Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre

It’s not really Christmas until Vivek tells you that you aren’t an American but most of India is

https://xcancel.com/AgitpropMaster/status/2001482713275171209#m

Tuor Eladar @AgitpropMaster

It’s like the exact opposite of a yearly scheduled airing of “It’s a Wonderful Life”

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

A "Merry Rejoinder":

https://www.afpost.news/editorials/Vivek-Steals-Christmas

Vivek Ramaswamy’s developed a weird yuletide tradition. Every Christmas, it seems, he mounts his sleigh and slides down your feed — not to deliver gifts, but to tell you what counts as an American. A year ago at this time, it was “anyone smart enough to take a job from a middle class earner.” That take alone sufficed to drum him out of Trumpworld within a month — but he’s undeterred. A year later — just in time to lose us another governorship — in an op-ed for the New York Times , he’s back with an even broader definition: "Anybody who likes America or American-sounding stuff.'

Expand full comment
Bryce's avatar

Re: Amy Acton, Vivek, Casey

Unpopular opinion: divided government is far more effective than supermajority rule

Take West Virginia. Our legislature is almost completely Republican (two Dems in the State Senate, one of whom votes with the GOP about 80% of the time). Our governor is Republican. There isn’t a Democrat in statewide office.

And it’s a quagmire. Completely dysfunctional. The Republicans have divided themselves into camps of 1) traditional, jobs-and-tax-reform Republicans and 2) people who believe public schools should be abolished, abortion outlawed with no exceptions, etc. The latter camp, which preponderates, refuses to even engage on real issues, preferring red meat bills that are, ahem, full of sound and fury, accomplishing nothing. Usually they include some new way to sue or otherwise torment businesses (the personal injury lawyers have found easy marks among many gullible legislators). The GOP governor needs both sides’ support, and won’t pick a lane. Problems mount, nothing ever really gets done.

A Democrat governor basically solves this. The republicans would be unable to pass the red meat through the Gov’s desk (they could override a veto, but in a part-time legislature that’s a tough ask, when most bills are signed after lawmakers leave town). So they’d be forced to focus on things like job growth, economic development, school funding, foster care, etc.

It works in Kentucky, at least from an economic growth/capital investment standpoint. Whatever your thoughts on Beshear, you have to admit that they are one of the few primary beneficiaries of the American manufacturing growth this year.

All this to say, Acton is your best shot. Vivek would distract the legislature with red meat while plundering the state. Casey just seems like a hack. Acton sucks, but she won’t have much real power and the legislature will have to focus on actually achievable, real goals.

Expand full comment
Rick T.'s avatar

On the other hand, things are going pretty well here in Tennessee by keeping the democrats corralled into Nashville and Memphis local governments.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

Doesn't do much good if you don't wall 'em up in there.

Expand full comment
Rick T.'s avatar

Fair. We’ve got Musk digging a tunnel. Wish he’d start a 3D wall printing company.

Expand full comment
Bryce's avatar

The weird thing is, it’s the blue cities in red states experiencing all the growth. Even in WV, the only areas experiencing any growth are blue ones. I lived in one (Morgantown) for the past four years. It’s run by a bunch of goofy progressives, and not terribly well, but businesses are moving in so fast they’re literally running out of land (and having to build wonky access roads to develop previously inaccessible land).

Expand full comment
Rick T.'s avatar

Guessing it’s maybe because the red state government sets the business climate and the blue city sets the cultural one which they see as desirable?

Expand full comment
Julian's avatar

Seems to be what's happening in Nashville - downtown offices filled with younger millennials, all the actual decision makers moving to Williamson county...

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

I agree; one party states often seem to be poorly governed.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

(Oregon enters the chat)

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

... joined by Hellinois.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

About to be cheering for the gary indiana bears

Expand full comment
Steve Ward's avatar

Sounds like a AA team.

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

Alcoholics Anonymous has a baseball team?

Expand full comment
Henry C.'s avatar

And NY.

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

Let's hear from Michigan. Michigan or Minnesota.

Expand full comment
Wyatt LCB's avatar

I personally don't have many complaints from Michigan. But, we're having yet ANOTHER gas tax increase AND a HUGE weed tax hike AND "Consumers" Energy is hiking natural gas up 10% AND the AI tech lizards want our water and land reeeeeeaaaalllll bad. But, I can own basically any firearm I want, basically any car I want, and our real estate market hasn't *entirely* exploded... Yet

Expand full comment
Gianni's avatar

Washington State. We haven’t had a republican governor since 1980.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

Detroit: Ruled by Democrats since 1962!

Expand full comment
Gianni's avatar
17hEdited

Seattle elected its own Mamdani. She’s talking about city run grocery stores. She’s a democratic socialist in her 40’s, from NY. Her parents are University profs in NY. They sent her 3k a month for childcare, even though her and her partner have no jobs.

Expand full comment
Steve Ward's avatar

Is she going to propose (like has been done before) to completely close I-5 thru downtown?

Expand full comment
Rick T.'s avatar

And represented in Congress by a Dingell since 1933!

Expand full comment
MD Streeter's avatar

One of the bright spots was during the 2020 summer of love. Police Chief James Craig kept the protesters from turning into rioters, then he saddled up and prepared a run for governor and likely would have won... except that, somehow, someone found some "irregularities" in the list of signatures compiled in the petitions for his campaign and we're still stuck with Himmler.

Expand full comment
Bryce's avatar

The funny part is: the best example of one party rule gone awry is…..West Virginia

We had Democrat majorities until 2015. In the 1990s, there was 1 Republican in the Senate (Donna Boley, who is 90 and still there). Democrat supermajorities absolutely killed the state; a business couldn’t glance at us without getting sued, we spent money in an outrageous fashion, and we were dead broke. They absolutely wrecked the state. Republicans fixed a lot from 2015-2020, and now we’re back to square one.

Expand full comment
Chairworthiness's avatar

It must depend on how much power the governor has, both constitutionally and electorally. A dem governor of Ohio would obviously have more electoral power than one in WV based on the partisan margins.

Expand full comment
Chairworthiness's avatar

I think it also matters where the cross-partisan governor comes from. Long-time state rep/senator? Probably fine since he'll just cut deals with his former colleagues. A former administrator like Acton? Run. Her closest confidants will be activists running free, like inmates running the asylum. (Whether Republicans can commit themselves to being anything other than wardens of the asylum is a story for another day)

Expand full comment
Bryce's avatar

The former Senator deal works well in Kansas, seemingly

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

"Unpopular opinion: divided government is far more effective than supermajority rule"

As someone who has noted that we have 2 parties: the party of tax and spend, and the party of cut taxes and spend, I agree. The only time we seem to have decreasing national deficits over time is when the Democratic President is constrained by Republican Senate and House.

Expand full comment
Rick T.'s avatar

On the other hand :

“The U.S. budget deficit shrank by $41 billion to $1.775 trillion in the 2025 fiscal year as an increase in revenue from President Donald Trump's tariffs and cuts to education spending helped offset higher outlays on healthcare and retirement programs and interest on the debt, the Treasury Department said on Thursday.”

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-budget-deficit-falls-41-billion-1775-trillion-fiscal-2025-2025-10-16/

Expand full comment
Josh Arakes's avatar

Great!

Now our elected representatives just need to cut another $1,734 billion in 2026 to get to zero (non-deficit spending).

And then we can start paying off the $38 trillion debt.

Smh.

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you're talking about real money....

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Ask Ford!

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

I’ll give your comment a hearty Fuck No. Acton is a million times worse than Vivek for one simple reason: she wants the power to lord over us and make decisions for us. Vivek may be a slimy businessman, but he doesn’t want to nanny state us. And, just maybe, we get an actual effective Doge to cut down the sow of Ohio government. Sorry, but any clear thinking Ohioan voting for Acton is voting to send themselves to a concentration camp if she can find an excuse to build them.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

How many hours have you spent rowing through the internet sewer looking for ideas that match what you want to think when you could have simply watched the many videos of Vivek engaging with local Ohioans? His social media is littered with his discussions. I can’t imagine trying so hard to believe in such bullshit. Get off-line and try the real world for a change.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

That is a lot of ad hominem attacks on me without providing ANY evidence against my claims (which mostly come from his own mouth): true to form Rajesh.

Of course he pretends to talk to "local Ohioans," and some, particularly the aged, are easily hoodwinked.

But I have provided ample evidence from HIS OWN tweets, NYT editorials, and campaign videos about his support for replacing Americans with H-1Bs (which came into focus an entire year ago https://www.newsweek.com/vivek-ramaswamy-h1b-visa-fallout-breaks-social-media-silence-2016523).

Show me ONE time where Vivek criticizes India or Hinduism or ITServe or H-1B visas.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

You want him to criticize his ethnicity? To prove what?

Business people like H1B visas. Shocker.

None of that matters to me because I care about individual liberty first. I think Trump is a terrible person yet I voted for him for the same reason.

I recall a bit about your circumstances, so I’ll assume you feel like you were cheated out of something because some undeserving person got it instead. Sorry man, if that is the case. Time to get over it and make something happen.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

He doesn't have to criticize his ethnicity. But Indians are waging war against Americans, and in that context, just like a Japanese candidate in WWII or an Arab candidate in 2002, in order to be fit for office, he would need to make clear that he is only loyal to America, but he, on almost a weekly basis, shows that his loyalty is to Indians at the expense of Americans (including his association with ITServe) and his utter contempt for Americans and American culture.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/12/david-brooks-ramaswamy/681188/

"Business people": he's not a business person, he's a fraud:

https://www.newsweek.com/vivek-ramaswamy-fraud-always-has-been-opinion-1823853

"Get over it WHILE I SUPPORT THE COMPLETE TAKEOVER OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM BY A CARTEL WHO WILL EXPONENTIALLY EXACERBATE THE PROBLEM" is not a reasonable position. This isn't personal; it's a population-scale issue:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/13/style/h1b-visa-young-conservatives-maga.html [inaccurate, but a mainstream publication]

https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-lost-generation/

Expand full comment
ScaryLarryPants's avatar

Are you doing this for reals? Just curious. Most anyone else just talking shit in here sort of leans towards being funny at some point.

Expand full comment
anatoly arutunoff's avatar

my dad--you can't find a stronger constitutionalist american and he immigrated at age 30 in 1923--humorously said decades ago that the mafia could run america more freely--all they'd want is a big cut of your money and you could do whatever the heck you wanted

Expand full comment
Morgan's avatar

Well, Vegas was waaay better when it was run by the mob.

Expand full comment
Ronnie Schreiber's avatar

"Israel-first".

What an effing grifter. No Democrats, not even Chuck Schumer, are particularly pro Israel except for maybe Fetterman. They're terrified of their hard left flank who think that the biggest victims of the Bondi Beach attack are Muslims.

Expand full comment
KoR's avatar

Short of volunteering for the IDF, idk how much more Pro Israel the likes of Schumer, Jeffries, and Richie Torres or whatever could possibly be.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

I will NEVER understand why American Jews don't have their Israeli brethren's backs.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Jews are like women. They hate eachother.

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

You'd be sOO cute with short hair!

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

😂

Expand full comment
Andrew White's avatar

And themselves. Literally hate. Not figurative.

Almost 30 years ago I played hide the sausage with a jewish girl from a family of self-important academic leftists. They voted for every stupid thing coming down the pike, especially if it was against their interests. Proudly. And they would argue loudly with other Jews they encountered if they went to temple or kept holy days because, you know, fuck all that. Be a Soviet, or whatever, as long as you're a cowardly nihilist with soft hands.

Naturally, I have reconnected with them and have been harassi- er, reminding them that their self-loating and stupidity founded entirely on a lack of being useful to the society around them and living in a glass menagerie inside an ivory tower has helped bring this about.

Man, they fucking hate me for reminding them of that. I've been working a laugh react like a lumberjack works a sharp axe. The best part is when they other Jews chime in to defend them and then they start bickering amongst one another.

Leftists are the worst, but also good entertainment online and in meatspace.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

maybe its like african blacks and american blacks

Expand full comment
KoR's avatar

I'm not Jewish and won't pretend like I have any authority to speak for, well, anyone, but I'd wager it has a lot to do with the flagrant corruption and war crimes the government of Israel participates in.

Hard to have a lot of sympathy when for years social media feeds were full of IDF soldiers smiling at the horror they created alongside images of literal children bombed into confetti.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

I find it difficult to sympathize with the Muslims who want every Israeli dead, for no better reason than that the Israelis are Jews, when the Israelis defeat them time and again.

Never forget the Israelis are fighting an enemy that wants them all dead and believes it has divine mandate to do it by any means necessary.

Expand full comment
KoR's avatar

Yup it’s pretty fucked any way you look at it. Not here to defend Hamas. But also not gonna sit back and say that wantonly murdering tens of thousands of people is good and cool either.

Also to “both sides” an argument that I am impossibly undereducated on, but current zeitgeist makes it so that your last paragraph could also apply to how Israel’s hardliners view Gazans.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar
8hEdited

The Muslims started the fight with the Israelis. When you mix your military assets in with your civilians and then go pick a fight with neighbors that just want to be left alone and don't fuck around, you don't get to complain when you lose a hospital or a shopping mall to an airstrike.

Muslims playing the world's annoying little brother.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Let me give you an awful alternative to which, AHEM, I do not subscribe:

Jews can't victim-game their way to effective super-citizen status in the United States if they always have Israel as an obvious alternative. You can't be a victim if you have a whole country of your own. So Diaspora Jews undermine Israel to better utilize victimhood in their European and North American host countries.

Not saying I believe that, but I've heard it.

Expand full comment
Henry C.'s avatar

Occam's Katana, that.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

your right its not the democrats

its everyone in the govt (aside from like 4 people but whatever)

Expand full comment
Ronnie Schreiber's avatar

Would you say the same about Europe Firsters? How many members of Congress advocate pulling out of NATO? The amount of blood and treasure Americans have spent defending Europe over the past 110 years (or Taiwan and Japan for the matter) dwarf whatever aid has been sent to Israel.

Almost all aid to Israel, about 85%, is obligated to be spent on U.S. military hardware. Additionally, the dollar value of Israeli military tech research that is obligated to be shared with the U.S. is about 2.5 times the military aid we send them.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

"Would you say the same about Europe Firsters?"

not sure what specifically youre asking about here

"Almost all aid to Israel"

but why on earth are they even getting aid in the first place?

Expand full comment
Ronnie Schreiber's avatar

Why are people who support the trillions in military aid we’ve given to Europe not called Europe Firsters? Why is that relationship a given?

Israel gets aid because enough politicians have been persuaded that it is either in America’s best interests or their own personal political interests to do so. Like any other issue in American politics. If you’re going to complain about AIPAC, that puts you on the side of Hillary Clinton in the Citizens United case. Jewish Americans and their allies have the right to make political contributions, even in advocacy for friendly foreign nations, just as have European Americans done for over a century, resulting in the deaths of over 350,000 American servicemembers.

Of course, opponents of aid to Europe can’t rely on centuries old tropes about dual loyalty and perfidious cabals pulling strings.

Expand full comment
Henry C.'s avatar

Cut it all off. Every dime.

Expand full comment
Landon McMeekin's avatar

Well, Ronnie, I'm With Her on this one, at least as far as members of Congress go. I'd like to see foreign aid shut the hell off, permanently, tomorrow. We're trillions of dollars in the hole as a nation; we need to put on our own oxygen mask first.

I'm not an Israel-hater; in fact, I rather admire the balls on them, and I'm in favor of supporting them militarily in times of crisis. I just think they ought to pay their own fuckin' meal-ticket like everybody else.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Id say the overlap of cut israel off is close to a circle with the cut nato off. Im america first, not israel first, not europe first. Europe has been free loading on our military for as long as i can remember

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

My Ven diagram doesn't have much overlap at all.

We get 1000x the benefit of aid from Israel as we do for European aid. We get nothing from Europe, except for a Christian heritage, a common history, the Magna Carta, and English Common Law, so nothing in the last 100 years, and precious few in 250. We've received absolutely nothing but a good vacation destination, expensive watches, and sports cars for the entirety of my life. We've paid for all of those as well.

Europe has used our money to fund their social system, then returned the favor by lecturing us on... well, everything. I;m not sure GB even has freedom of speech anymore, and every Western European nation has sided with terrorists in the UN for years. they're a parody of liberal democracies.

Israel has done our dirty work in the ME for 80 years. They've made our weapons systems better, and given us Waze (which alone entitles them to whatever we give them).

... to say nothing of the moral imperative of being the only place in the entire world right now where we're on the right side of history. Everywhere else we're chumming with enemies, and cavorting with despots. Israel is free and strong, and a good ally. Giving money to them is like giving it to ourselves (they buy our military hardware with our aid).

Expand full comment
Gianni's avatar

Remember when they were talking about base closures in Europe. Germany screamed bloody murder at prospect of losing the multiplier effect on the local economies near the bases.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar
17hEdited

"Why are people who support the trillions in military aid we’ve given to Europe not called Europe Firsters? Why is that relationship a given?"

assuming it really is trillions in military aid (gotta account for decades of aid total for that kind of number i presume) then the argument becomes easier than supporting isreal becuase they actually act like allies and trading partners. this doesnt mean im in favour of shoveling absurd amounts of money out of america

"Israel gets aid because enough politicians have been persuaded that it is either in America’s best interests or their own personal political interests to do so."

uh. not keen on the wording here. pretty sus. does europe need to coerce american politicians to the same degree too or does europe provide some tangible benefit?

"that puts you on the side of Hillary Clinton"

an evil dog faced clock is right sometimes or however the saying goes

"opponents of aid to Europe can’t rely on centuries old tropes about dual loyalty and perfidious cabals pulling strings"

probably becuase they dont have those kinds of problems. when was the last time a german (or other european country) dual citizen got into the senate and argued for policy in favour of germany?

anyway america isnt the worlds police or purse so cut the aid etc.

Expand full comment
Ronnie Schreiber's avatar

Since you brought it up, there was a pretty active pro-Nazi German bund in the U.S. in the 1930s.

The dual-citizen thing is simply a lie. There are no dual citizens in Congress. The lie is based on the fact that Jews can get instant Israeli citizenship, should they move there, so Jew haters take that and spin it into the lie that every Jew in Congress is a dual citizen. Hell, they even list Gentile politicians with Germanic, not Yiddish names. My brother moved to Israel and is an Israeli citizen. He does keep an American passport because he'd be stupid not to, but he doesn't absentee vote in elections here.

It reminds me of something I saw in a YouTube chat today, where someone claimed that Jews have special access to mortgages and other loans as if Gentiles were somehow being discriminated against. There's something called Free Loan Associations that were founded 100 years ago to provide emergency loans. They are charitable organizations, funded privately. I can't walk into a bank and get a better interest rate because I'm circumcised. I can, however, apply to the local Hebrew Free Loan Association for an emergency car loan so I can get to work, which would likely have to be guaranteed by a co-signer. Jew haters take a wholesome charity and turn it into a conspiracy. If a religiously based private charitable organization offers starter mortgages for young families, it's not a conspiracy.

Expand full comment
Rick T.'s avatar

NATO was to keep the Germans down, the Americans in, and the Russians out. No longer necessary or even desirable in my opinion.

Expand full comment
Walter Sobchak, Esq.'s avatar

It is so they will buy overpriced American military equipment. The money does not leave the US.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

so several billion taxpayer dollars goes from the govt to the military industrial complex and isreal gets weapons for free

really odd way to go about it and im not a fan

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Should we stop supporting israel, yes

Should we pull out of nato?

Like me thinking i dont need a fifth child (yes)

Expand full comment
Henry C.'s avatar

Massie introduced a bill to the latter. The MIC lobby will never allow it, but still.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

NATO has no reason to exist. There is no longer a Soviet system. There is just Russia, which is an economic kitten.

Expand full comment
Henry C.'s avatar

I disagree on the last point. They have land, resources, a strategic location with ascendant allies and serious men in charge.

Expand full comment
Danimal's avatar

I thought Headset Casey using "Israel-first" in a derogatory way was just his jealousy that Israel bombed all of Iran's air defense and nuclear facilities before he could be the USAF B-2 pilot following it up with a bunker buster bomb.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

if he really was america first he wouldnt have wanted to get involved in the middle east to begin with

Expand full comment
Mozzie's avatar

Always amusing to see a crown vic with vaguely euro plates on a [insert city] cobble street. Can't tell if the other is supposed to be a VW Bora/Opel Astra hybrid, and I mean that in looks, not powertrain. The main mystery is what is on the roof of the crown vic. Angry cat? Snorkel? We'll never know.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

You'd think that my "Gemini PRO" membership would entitle me to more!

Expand full comment
AK47isthetool's avatar

"The lifesaving surgery is available in the States, but Canada has a different solution for her: free death."

Methinks the British and their descendants did not realize that "A Modest Proposal" was intended to be satire.

Expand full comment
Ice Age's avatar

Same problem they had with Orwell.

Expand full comment
-Nate's avatar

The 'Supremacy' poster/sticker/whatever is *perfect* .

So then, good news from FoMoCo, they can sell all the light & medium duty trucks they can build so forget EVs .

About this "MAID" thing ~ I understand wanting to die but cannot one just buy sufficient dope to get high and never wake up again ? .

Chronic pain is a real thing .

Try putting a medium size pebble in your shoe, one that makes you limp to walk at all, then keep it there for two days, you'll begin to have a -fraction- of the misery many deal with 24/7 .

Pretty neat to have found the earliest Corvette, being me, I'd prefer it with the Slip 'N Slide Powerglide and the 235 with side draught carbys .

It's a _Sports_Car_, not a Race Car .

Happily I still run into 1950's vintage Corvettes in survivor condition being driven and enjoyed the way Duntov (? SP ?) intended .

-Nate

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

"I'd prefer it with the Slip 'N Slide Powerglide"

i still have no idea why a 3 speed manual was never offered (i do have a slight idea) given that they absolutely had one and even if the ratios werent ideal it could still have been made to work

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

I believe that 1981 was the last year a Corvette had a 3 speed manual transmission that was offered, which is kind of crazy. I thought they were all 4 speeds by that point.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

1981? surely thats a misprint theres no way

im not calling you a liar i just find it nearly impossible to believe. i guess that might have been a muncie three speed?

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

Correction, 1969 was the last year, so the C3 Corvette.

Years ago I once saw a 3 speed C2 manual for sale and thought it was a misprint, but no, the 3 speed was available.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

And that would have been a three on the tree.

My guess is they only got rid of it because they had to do a safety steering column in the Eighties.

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

Well this is a rabbit hole to go down. At least on the C2 the 3 speed manual was floor mounted. Since the C3 had much of the C2 carried over underneath, I’ll guess that it was also floor mounted in 68 and 69. Maybe because of the torquey motors some buyers thought that the 3 speed was adequate.

I also can’t recall a Corvette with a shifter on the column for an automatic or a manual. Even the original 2 speed Powerglides were floor mounted.

Expand full comment
Joe griffin's avatar

Agree with what you say about maid, and about the c1

Expand full comment
-Nate's avatar

Yeah ;

I'm not settled in my mind yet about the assisted dying thing, but then maybe those who need / want to end it all cannot / don't understand how to go get dope illicit or otherwise .

-Nate

Expand full comment
Joe griffin's avatar

I am on the list for the hardcover, signed would be very cool, after Christmas is good!

Canada and their special health care is evil in the extreme, they import all of the third world and crap all over their own citizens, that should be considered a high crime!

I think the corvette should be sorted out properly and sold to the corvette museum, what a great story.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

the mass immigration is becuase of the century initialtive which is a (company? task force? group?) who desires canada to have 100 million people residing inside it by 2100

why 100 million? why 2100? who knows but theyre on track to importing more than a million (almost entirely third worlders) a year. all this to increase gdp or something.

https://www.centuryinitiative.ca/

transparently evil

Expand full comment
Joe griffin's avatar

That is a form of corporate cronyism, a way to create a slave state, seems totally insane.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

and by the way this is all happening with nearly zero improvement to any of our public services so theres a massive strain on everything

Expand full comment
Joe griffin's avatar

White replacement theory, they don’t care about 100 million, they want cheap labor.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

bingo on both

literal population erasure but nobody cares

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

There was a headline in the Financial Post that read “How did Canada’s young people become its unhappiest generation?”

A response on X said: “Because they have to compete with the poorest people on Earth for jobs and the richest people on Earth for housing.”

Kind of says it all.

Expand full comment
Matthew Horgan's avatar

Human capital to increase “shareholder value”

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

gdp must go up at any cost even if it stops meaning anything at all

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

GDP up! GDP per capita DOWN!

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

*slams table*

LINE GO UP LINE GO UP LINE GO UP

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

"I’ll be printing a limited (heh) number of hardbacks at well, signing them as you like"

if this means youll write something clever/wise/absurd in it you can count me in already

"Is Casey serious about his anti-H1B, America First approach?"

i highly doubt hes the actual america first guy he pretends to be. he does not come across as being anywhere near focused or driven enough for the cause

"knock on doors for the Democratic candidate"

the candidates really have you stuck between a rock and a brown place

"If I had terminal access, I could keep you all posted on this"

i was curious about them until i found out it was 30k or something to use

"Canada can’t provide her the surgery. In fact, they can’t even get her in to see an endocrinologist, something that is usually a 90-day hassle at most for Americans"

our heathcare is godawful and everyone is worse off for it. a billion dollars for a raft of random brown people instead of caring for our own. between fucking us over at every opportunity and unending mass immigration it really does look like a kind of ethnic cleansing. evil in all caps

"Will Millennials have any interest in keeping and preserving 1953 Corvettes?"

more millenials will gain an interest in old cars once boomers stop thinking their shitboxes are worth 45k barely running. they have no real right to complain about the state of affairs.

i had an idea for an early 50s corvette "zr1" that would be based on contemporary tech and tests chevrolet did at the time but damn a c1 is still crazy money

Expand full comment
Charlie's avatar

I thought that was https://cwcoach.com/ for a second. Which would probably align with the demo for a C1 as well.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Okay that's funny!

Expand full comment
Charlie's avatar

https://cwcoach.com/povcwc/view.php?ccode=550288&noreturnbuttons=1#

This one has Klockau's name all over it.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

From the link ☹️:

After 16 years of producing over 225 custom retro Corvettes, Classic Reflection Coachworks (CRC) has closed its Lakewood, Washington plant and will no longer produce their 50 and 60’s models

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

good lord

i suppose i should have specified that i wanted it to be period correct to the early 50s having things like a mccullough supercharger and magnesium halibrands

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

well that's cooler. Those old bodies on new cars never look right.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

its always the proportions

like those modern superbirds based on modern challengers they just look fat and horrid

Expand full comment
KoR's avatar

Paging Abimelec…

Expand full comment
typopete's avatar

Fellow Ohioan here. Only thing the GOP-dominated state legislature has done that was worthwhile was eliminating the front license plate a few years back.

Expand full comment
Colin's avatar

I'd take that!

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

That was one of the best things about moving from Illinois to NC! No front plate ever again.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

Doing nothing is better than doing damaging things. I’ll err on the side of doing nothing.

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

"In fact, they can’t even get her in to see an endocrinologist, something that is usually a 90-day hassle at most for Americans."

Americans *with insurance*. The rich and upper-middle class are fine, the Medicaid crowd struggles with having enough access to get an appointment within 90 days but at least they aren't delving into their meager savings...so as usual, it's the working poor who get screwed.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

over here sometimes you just die waiting to see someone

or your symptoms get far worse becuase your appointment is 18 months away

ive been fortunate enough to have never needed to see the inside of a hospital

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

Keep that string going as long as you possibly can....

I'm pretty convinced that there are no really good answers to the provision of healthcare, only bad ones and worse ones.

Expand full comment
Henry C.'s avatar

Same as "Democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others."

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

thats the game plan

i think socialized medicine can work but only if its not abused by third worlders and grifters

theres such an insane amount of bloat in the system that it boggles the mind

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

Bloat: our "non-profit" healthcare system laid off a percentage of its workforce a few days before announcing a $50 million private jet lease.

https://www.wtae.com/article/upmc-jet-florida/62283165

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

sensational

put their nuts in a vise

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

Thomas Sowell: “There are no solutions, only trade offs.”

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

In the usa, the working poor get screwed, in canada, everyone gets screwed. Socialism in a nutshell.

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

Awkwardly, the Heritage Foundation lists Canada as being a dozen places ahead of us on their latest Index of Economic Freedom.

https://www.heritage.org/index/pages/report

Expand full comment
Jason Kodat's avatar

And Sweden is 2 places ahead of them...possibly why they have more billionaires per capita than we do.

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

Sweden also leads on grenade attacks. And rapes. So there’s that.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

really makes you wonder how that happened

Expand full comment
Ataraxis's avatar

The craziest part is that they have not tried to fix it. And it is fixable.

Expand full comment
Scott A's avatar

Lol. They turned off bank accounts during covid. Canada is fucked

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

I understand voting AGAINST a candidate.

I personally can't do it, but I get it. I've got to pull the lever or fill in my oval for somebody I can at least stomach, or I'll write in somebody who I could. "The lesser of two evils" is still evil, and continuing to follow this logic leads us... well, to 2025.

But I get it.

What I don't get is supporting somebody who is so anti-freedom and anti-American that they were a part of the "C19-forever! Let's-keep-kids-from-going-to-school-because-I'm-so-afraid, get-the-jab-or-go-live-in-a-cave" Nazis of 2020/2021.

The sheer nonsense of everything that happened from 2020- 2022 was made "law" (fiat) by the Father-Knows-Best, anti-constitutional, freedom-hating FASCISM of every Democratic-majority municipality, county, or state in the union. If Amy Acton was a part of that at all, she has made herself forever ineligible to hold public office, since a requirement of the office is to uphold the very constitution she urinated all over, and then used to wipe herself in 2020.

I had held my nose and voted Democrat in some limited elections prior to 2020, when the Republican candidate was somebody I couldn't support (generally somebody from a big-business/ investment background) -- but C19 cured me forever. What happened after the October 7 massacre sealed the deal for me.

The lesser of two evils is still evil, and continuing to follow this flawed logic has led us to the point we are today.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

Politics above middle school student council is never just about an individual!

Ohio is a strongly Republican state. Therefore, long-term, the issue is the quality of Republican candidates. A Democrat Governor will be constrained by the legislature, and likely replaced after one term.

In contrast, if {Vivek Ramaswamy} is elected, he, high ranking party operative {Mehek Cooke}, and Solicitor General {Mathura Sridharan} will have free reign to replace HUNDREDS of appointed officials with fellow {Only Hindus In Office} operatives until the entire state government looks like this: https://itserve.org/leadership-2025/, all while the Republican legislature provides full support to their agenda. It's the playbook we have seen run at countless corporations.

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

So write in Jack Baruth. Or your own name. Or the ghost of Woody Hayes. Just don't vote for the Covid-nazi.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

i mean if american elections are as porous as ive been led to believe and anyone can vote then maybe we could get jack to win

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

Yes, exactly. She wants power to tell you what to do. Voting for that is insane.

Expand full comment
Sir Morris Leyland's avatar

I understand your position, but if it comes down to

Vivek 49.4%

Amy 49.2%

Idi Amin 1.4%

Then the enemy wins and you have: https://globalchristianrelief.org/resources/countries/india/

Vivek embraces his Hinduism and has met with, and praised, BJP PM Modi: https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-news/vivek-ramaswamy-hails-great-leader-pm-narendra-modi-says-he-restored-lost-indian-pride-exclusive-article-113669888

Expand full comment
Stan Galat's avatar

I understand your position, Sir -- I just can't ascribe to it.

I think we stand at this particular moment in history because we've made horrible candidates our only choice. We got here because people refuse to vote their conscience.

So, it's Hinduism H1b or a Covid-Nazi.

Alternatively, if enough people just refused to vote for either horrible choice... perhaps we might have the alternative choice a lot of us really want.

... but I do get it.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

"So, it's Hinduism H1b or a Covid-Nazi"

That's the choice. And the Covid-Nazi is better, because Ohio can survive another lockdown better than it can survive having a million more upscale immigrants wiping out the middle class.

Expand full comment
JT's avatar

Wait. So you’re saying Idi Amin is an option?

Tell me more.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

I liked his approach to debate, honestly.

Expand full comment
Steve Ward's avatar

If I lived in Ohio I’d write in Jack.

Expand full comment
Henry C.'s avatar

Understand that the GOP running dogshit candidates as controlled opposition is entirely intentional.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

Vivek is the ultimate dogshit candidate. He is capable of losing Ohio as a Republican in the Trump era. That is insane.

Expand full comment
Blake's avatar

I guess I'm in a small minority of folks who are fans of serial hybrid pickups? Fully electric pickups are such a small niche they can only survive on massive subsidies or loss leaders/carbon credit instruments. (The working folks who could benefit from their low running costs typically can't afford the price when new.) But, a serial hybrid potentially ticks all the boxes for everyone who actually needs a truck: inexpensive running costs for around-town / light duty, and the ability to tow very similarly to a diesel for meaningful distances without any range anxiety. The key will be to keep the costs below what current diesels sell for.

Expand full comment
Speed's avatar

im with you on that

having a gas or diesel generator onboard is a colossal improvement over a pure ev

Expand full comment
KoR's avatar

Yeah. Around ~$60k to start and the EREVs have a shot, I’d think.

Expand full comment
Jack Baruth's avatar

The key is to make it reliable and not cost a zillion dollars, which is a tall order.

Expand full comment
Blake's avatar

To me, new diesel pickups already cost a zillion dollars (a Platinum dually's $100K!), so if they can price an EREV in between the ICE and diesels they'll have a winner.

Expand full comment